Romance Books

Source

Romance’s first advantage is its flexibility. The category is not a monolith but a broad network of interlinked subgenres, which rise and fall in popularity as readers’ tastes shift. Right now “romantasy” is huge, and “sports romances” are in. “Historicals” are on the wane; “dark romance,” potentially on the rise. These changes are often cyclical, and the big subcategories eventually come back around: “About every 10 to 15 years we have a vampire surge,” Christine M. Larson, the author of Love in the Time of Self-Publishing, a multidecade history of the romance ecosystem, told me. Tying the genre together are its clear and expected plot beats—and, of course, marketing. But because the category is so broad, a romance novel can be any novel that proudly calls itself a romance.

Another important strength of the category may look at first like a contradiction. Despite its long-standing economic success, the genre—and the culture around it—retains the status of a defiant outsider. Since modern romance developed in the 1970s, these novels have been thoroughly ignored by highbrow critics and prestigious-award juries. But such exclusion may have helped their readers—and more importantly their writers and publishers—evolve into a cohort that Larson labels an “open-elite network.”

The Publishing Industry’s Most Swoon-Worthy Genre

An interesting look at the success of romance literature. It is a huge cash cow for publishers but a lot of authors try to self publish too. I remember reading about the psychology of women addicted to it. There were escapist and porn overtones to it. Anything that is addictive is worthy of study. As someone said “controllable obsessions are not interesting.”
In Querencia, Betsy, Steve’s partner at the time, tried her hand at it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *